Archives for March 2013

Thomas Manton on the Need for More Sound Books

Thomas Manton

Thomas Manton

A good friend sent me this remarkable quotation from Thomas Manton today on why we still need to keep writing and reading sound, biblical literature:

There is no end of books, and yet we seem to need more every day. There was such a darkness brought in by the fall, as will not thoroughly be dispelled till we come to heaven; where the sun shineth without either cold or night. For the present, all should contribute their help according to the rate and measure of their abilities. Some hold up a candle, others a torch; but all are useful. The press is an excellent means to scatter knowledge, were it not so often abused.

All complain there is enough written, and think that now there should be a stop. Indeed, it were well if in this scribbling age there were some restraint. Useless pamphlets are grown almost as great a mischief as the erroneous and profane.

Yet tis not good to shut the door upon industry and diligence. There is yet room left to discover more, above all that hath been said, of the wisdom of God and the riches of his grace in the gospel; yea, more of the stratagems of Satan and the deceitfulness of man’s heart. Means need to be increased every day to weaken sin and strengthen trust, and quicken us to holiness.

Fundamentals are the same in all ages, but the constant necessities of the church and private Christians, will continually enforce a further explication. As the arts and slights [expertise] of besieging and battering increase, so doth skill in fortification. If we have no other benefit by the multitude of books that are written, we shall have this benefit: an opportunity to observe the various workings of the same Spirit about the same truths, and indeed the speculation is neither idle nor unfruitful.

—Cited from Manton’s letter to the reader in The Works of Richard Sibbes, 3:3.

Seven Problems with Arminian Universal Redemption

In the theology of Arminianism, we are told that Christ died to make it possible for everyone to be saved, if they so choose. This is a rejection of the Reformed view that Christ died to actually save a particular people chosen by God. The Arminian view is by far the most popular view of the atonement in the Christian church today. However, serious objections must be lodged against Arminian universal redemption, among which are these:

It slanders God’s attributes, such as His love. Arminianism presents a love that actually doesn’t save. It is a love that loves and then, if refused, turns to hatred and anger. It is not unchangeable love that endures from everlasting to everlasting.

It slanders God’s wisdom. Would God make a plan to save everyone, then not carry it out? Would He be so foolish as to have His Son pay for the salvation of all if He knew that Christ would not be able to obtain what He paid for? I would feel foolish if I went into a store and bought something, then walked out without it. Yet Arminianism asks us to believe that this is true of salvation—that a purchase was made, a redemption, and yet the Lord walked away without those whom He had redeemed. That view slanders the wisdom of God.

It slanders God’s power. Arminian universalism obliges us to believe that God was able to accomplish the meriting aspect of salvation, but that the applying aspect is dependent on man and his free will. It asks us to believe that God has worked out everyone’s salvation up to a point, but no further for anyone.

It slanders God’s justice. Did Christ satisfy God’s justice for everyone? Did Christ take the punishment due to everybody? If He did, how can God punish anyone? Is it justice to punish one person for the sins of another and later to punish the initial offender again? Double punishment is injustice.

It disables the deity of Christ. A defeated Savior is not God. This error teaches that Christ tried to save everyone but didn’t succeed. It denies the power and efficacy of Christ’s blood, since not all for whom He died are saved. Hence, Christ’s blood was wasted on Judas and Esau. Much of His labor, tears, and blood was poured out in vain.

It undermines the unity of the Trinity. Just as parents must work together to run a family effectively, so the triune God co-labors in each of His persons with identical purposes and goals. One person cannot possibly have in mind to save some that another person has not determined to save, but Arminian universalism implicitly teaches just that. It denies the Father’s sovereign election, since Christ would have died for more than God decreed to save, thereby making Christ seem to have a different agenda than that of the Father. That would have been anathema to Jesus, who asserted that His entire redemptive ministry was consciously designed to carry out a divinely arranged plan (John 6:38–39).

Similarly, Arminian redemption disavows the saving ministry of the Holy Spirit, since it claims that Christ’s blood has a wider application than does the Spirit’s saving work. Any presentation of salvation that makes the Father or the Spirit’s work in salvation lag behind Christ’s work contradicts the inherent unity of the Trinity. God cannot be at odds with Himself. Arminianism is inconsistent universalism.

It rejects all of the other points of Calvinism. The Arminian view of the atonement rejects the doctrine of man’s total depravity, teaching that man has the ability within himself to receive and accept Christ. It rejects unconditional election, teaching that God elects on the basis of foreseen faith. It rejects irresistible grace, teaching that man’s will is stronger than God’s. It rejects the perseverance of the saints, teaching that man can apostatize from the faith.

It detracts from the glory of God. If God does everything in salvation, He gets all the glory. But if God can do only so much and not everything, then the person who completes the application of salvation gets at least some glory. That is why there is so much emphasis in mass evangelism on the free will of man. Universal atonement exalts the will of man and debases the glory of God.

It perverts evangelism. We repeatedly hear today in evangelistic messages: “Christ died for you. What will you do for Him?” But do we ever find in the Bible that someone is told personally, “Christ died for you”? Rather, we find the work of Christ explained, followed by a call to everyone: “Repent and believe the gospel.” The message is not “Believe that Christ died for you” or “Believe that you are one of the elect.” It is “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved.”

It disparages the intrinsic efficacy of the atonement itself. Arminians teach that Christ’s work induces the Father to accept graciously what Jesus accomplished in place of a full satisfaction of His justice. It is as if Jesus persuaded His Father to accept something less than justice demanded. That is why Arminius claimed that when God saved sinners, He moved from His throne of justice to His throne of grace. But God does not have two thrones; His throne of justice is His throne of grace (Ps. 85:10). Arminianism forgets that the atonement does not win God’s love but is the provision of His love.

Reformation Indy Conference, Indianapolis (March 22–24, 2013)

Pastor Whitla and His Sons

Pastor Whitla and His Sons

My daughter Esther and I drove to Indianapolis on Friday to serve the RPCNA church pastored by Gordon Keddie and David Whitla. My task was to speak five times on Spiritual Warfare for their annual conference called Reformation Indy: Fighting Against Indwelling Sin, Fighting Against Satan, Fighting Against Worldliness, Enduring in the Battle to the End, and Heaven: No More War!

I also did two Q and A sessions—one for the conference and one for a group of young people on Saturday evening. The questions were perceptive and almost all of them were related to the addresses. I felt blessed being with these pastors and among these dear people, many of whom I had met only last year at the denominational conference in Marion, Indiana.

An Eager Book Buyer

An Eager Book Buyer

I particularly enjoyed meeting Jerry Porter, who recently retired from being CEO of a local hospital; he certainly has a great deal of wisdom to impart about leadership, time management, and a host of subjects. Then too I was touched by 8-year-old Robert who said to me, “I really agree with you that it is very hard to resist Satan’s temptations; I pray every day to God for help to do that.” Esther managed the book table efficiently; we were encouraged with how many people bought books about or by the Puritans.

Robert (left) and His Friend

Robert (left) and His Friend

PCRT at Byron Center, MI (March 15–16, 2013)

Speaking at PCRT 2013

Speaking at PCRT 2013

After returning from Greenville, I had about 24 hours to turn around for another conference: the Philadelphia Conference of Reformed Theology (PCRT), which drew 500 people, began on Friday evening in the First CRC of Byron Center, Michigan. Providentially, the theme was very similar to Greenville’s conference: “In the Beginning: God, Adam, and You.”

Other speakers included Kevin DeYoung, Jon Payne, Richard Phillips, and Derek Thomas. I spoke on Saturday on The Case for Adam, The Puritans on Adam and the Covenant of Works, and Christ the Second Adam. The addresses I was able to take in were quite helpful; each in their own way affirmed Carl Trueman’s conviction that the battle for the historical Adam is a front-burner issue today.

This week Friday, my daughter Esther and I hope to travel to Indianapolis where I hope to speak five times on Spiritual Warfare for Rev. Gordon J. Keddie, pastor of the RPCNA church there. Pray that God will bless this conference in a mighty way, especially for His struggling people.

Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary Conference

Speakers at the Greenville Conference

Speakers at the Greenville Conference

Part of Library Purchased

Part of Library Purchased

I’m back safely from ministering in Greenville, South Carolina, for several days, where I spoke three times, did some interviews, purchased the bulk of a large library, reconnected with old friends and met new ones, and enjoyed the Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary conference which focused on the doctrine of man.

With Some Happy Book Buyers

Conference subjects and speakers included: Supernatural Creation of Man (Richard Belcher), The Covenant of Works (Guy Waters), Death Before the Fall (Matthew Holst), Boston’s Fourfold State (William VanDoodewaard), Man, The Image of God, and The Cultural Mandate and the Great Commission (Nelson Kloosterman), Original Sin and Depravity (Joey Pipa), Questioning the Philosophy of Science Used to Question the Bible’s Doctrine of Man (Gabriel Fluhrer), and The Temptation and the Fall (myself). Book sales were unusually good for a conference of 350.

Today I am preparing for the Philadelphia Conference of Reformed Theology (PCRT) which begins this evening in the First CRC of Byron Center, Michigan. Providentially, the theme is very similar to Greenville’s conference: “In the Beginning: God, Adam, and You.” Other speakers include Kevin DeYoung, Jon Payne, Richard Phillips, and Derek Thomas. I am scheduled to speak three times tomorrow: The Case for Adam, The Puritans on Adam and the Covenant of Works, and Christ the Second Adam. All three are new addresses, so I covet your prayers.

Pre-Publication Sale at Logos

logo_logos_5Logos has asked me to let readers of my blog know that they are offering The Select Works of Joel R. Beeke at the pre-pub order price of 22% off. It’s a collection of 28 books I authored, co-authored, or edited. Go here to check it out.

Preaching in Busan, Korea (February 25–28)

With Lead Pastor & Conference Chairman, Busan, South Korea

With Lead Pastor & Conference Chairman, Busan, South Korea

I flew to Busan, South Korea, to speak at a large conference. On the 13-hour flight over the Pacific (Chicago to Tokyo—the snow-capped mountains in Alaska were breathtaking from the air), I spoke with a young Chinese woman who had very little knowledge of Christianity. She seemed quite interested in learning more, but it was a bit challenging to communicate with her. I’m afraid that I gave up too quickly.

Though this is my seventh trip to South Korea, I had never been in Busan before. It is a quite impressive city of nearly four million people. At the request of the conference organizers, I gave an address on “Puritan Worship” to a conference of 10,000 people, of which 5,000 or more were ministers. Afterward, some ministers approached me to say that they needed to hear the Puritan emphasis on all worship being grounded in the Scriptures. Pray with me that the conservative Puritan principles for worship that I was called upon to underscore will bear fruit in many Korean churches where the regulative principle in worship is increasingly being watered down.

As usual, the Koreans go over the top in showing kindness and respect to speakers. They won’t even let you carry your Bible and your iPad.

It felt strange to fly all that way to give one address, then fly home again the next day, but that was God’s providence for this trip. On the way back over the Pacific, I spoke at length with a middle-aged woman from Mexico who had just spent six months in southeast Asia traveling on her own. Her English was impeccable. She said that she would have no problem returning to Mexico City to get a new job due to her bilingual gift. She grew up with no religion at all, she said. “My father was Roman Catholic and my mother Lutheran, so since they couldn’t agree, they decided early on in their marriage to drop all religion.”

“So they believe in nothing?” I asked, to which she replied, “That’s right.”

“And you?” I asked. She laughed, “I guess I don’t believe in anything either.”

“Really?” I said. “So you don’t believe that there is a God who created this world and who made you?”

“I don’t know,” she said.

“Are you an atheist?” I asked.

“I’m not really sure,” she said, “I guess, to be honest with you, I never think about whether I believe in God or not.”

So our conversation began. We ended up talking about “what life is all about” (she never thinks about that either, she said). We talked about how we were created in Adam for the purpose of living to God’s glory, about sin and selfishness, about our need for salvation and God’s provided Savior, about our need for spiritual food (just as we need daily food) which we get from the Bible, about what the Bible is and why it is so important, and about the joy of knowing God and serving Him and living for the purpose for which God made us.

I then found out that neither she nor her parents have a Bible. She has seen a Bible before but has never read a single page of it.

“Do you have any friends that are Christians?” I asked.

“Well, not really; I have a few friends who are Roman Catholics, but they never go to church. They don’t really believe what they say they believe.”

“Has no one ever shared the gospel with you the way I am sharing it with you now?” I asked.

“Never!” she said emphatically.

“Would you like a Bible?” I asked.

“Sure,” she said. “I would like anything that makes me happier!”

We then talked about happiness for a while. I explained that we never get happiness from seeking to be happy, but happiness is always a byproduct of holiness, of finding salvation in Christ and then seeking by His grace to walk in God’s ways. I was surprised at how well she seemed to grasp this.

In the end, I promised to send her a Bible (she wanted an English rather than Spanish copy as she loves getting to know her English “even better”) and several books. She promised that she would read the Bible and the books and let me know what she thought of what she read.

Unknown to us, the couple behind us, Todd and Bernadette, was listening to our entire conversation, and couldn’t refrain from joining us. Bernadette was born with a serious disease that has crippled her body. She was supposed to die by the age of 8, but is now 46 years of age. Her husband cheerfully carried her from her seat to the bathroom three or four times on the trip back. She travels the world, with him always at her side, giving her testimony of God’s grace to different audiences.

Bernadette smiled at my friend from Mexico City, and said, “Everything this minister told you is right. God is so good. He makes me truly happy in his Son.”

God’s providence is wonderful. This dear couple reaffirmed everything I said. My new Mexican friend could not help but be impressed how this crippled woman was just beaming with joy at the goodness of God shown to her. Who can tell?